VIRENDRA SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/685/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010043262026

Filing Number

WPMS/2292/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPMS/685/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 30-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIRENDRA SINGH

    Adv. GEETANJALI DHAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.SRI SUKHDEV SINGH

  3. 3.SRI ROOP SINGH

  4. 4.BHAGWAN SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Civil Judge at Khatima to expeditiously decide Civil Suit No. 41 of 2024 (Virendra Singh vs. Sukhdev Singh) preferably within nine months. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo over the disputed property until the suit's final adjudication, as the underlying property ownership case remains pending before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the Civil Judge at Khatima to expeditiously decide Civil Suit No. 41 of 2024 (Virendra Singh vs. Sukhdev Singh) preferably within nine months. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo over the disputed property until the suit's final adjudication, as the underlying property ownership case remains pending before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case