VIRENDRA SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS/663/2019
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010043142019
Filing Number
WPSS/2309/2019
Filing Date
26-Mar-2019
Registration No
WPSS/663/2019
Registration Date
26-Mar-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
PROMOTION ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIRENDRA SINGH
Adv. Advocate- ,ABHIJAY NEGI,SNIGDHA TIWARI
-
2.DR. UMA SHANKAR SAVITA
Adv. S S YADAV
-
3.S.K. VERMA
Adv. S S YADAV
-
4.RAMESH CHANDRA
Adv. S S YADAV
-
5.NARENDRA SINGH GAUR
Adv. S S YADAV
-
6.GULSHER AHMED
Adv. S S YADAV
-
7.SMT. SOMWATI
Adv. S S YADAV
-
8.SMT. SUMAN CHATURVEDI
Adv. S S YADAV
-
9.SMT. PUSHPA GANGWAR
Adv. S S YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.
-
2.VICE CHANCELLOR G.B. PANT UNIVERSITY PANTNAGAR DISTRICT UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
Adv. SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL,Virendra Singh SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL
-
3.CHAIRMAN BOARD OF MANAGEMENT G.B. PANT UNIVERSITY PANTNAGAR DISTRICT UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
Adv. SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL,SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL
-
4.FINANCE COMPTROLLER G.B. PANT UNIVERSITY PANTNAGAR DISTRICT UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
Adv. SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL,SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL
-
5.CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER G.B. PANT UNIVERSITY PANTNAGAR DISTRICT UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
Adv. SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL,SATYENDRA SINGH LINGWAL
-
6.SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER INDIAN COUNCIL FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (I.C.A.R.) MODIPURA MEERUT
Adv. TEJ SINGH BISHT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging ICAR's February 2018 order declining to upgrade Research Assistant pay scales at G.B. Pant University. The court held that ICAR's decision to limit liability to existing university pay scales and sanctioned budgets was neither unjust nor arbitrary, and that petitioners lacked any vested right to higher pay scales from the funding agency. Any such claims must be directed against the employer, not ICAR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
07-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
-
23-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF
-
27-Aug-2025
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
05-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
After Fresh Matters -128
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
17-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
17-Jul-2025
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
15-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
Personal Appearance -4
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
14-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
Personal Appearance -4
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
30-Jun-2025
Personal Appearance -4
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
04-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
04-Jun-2025
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
05-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
05-May-2025
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
07-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
15-Oct-2024
Order On Applications (As Defective) -237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
30-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
30-Sep-2024
Order On Applications (As Defective) -237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
09-Sep-2024
Order On Applications (As Defective) -237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
06-Aug-2024
Order On Applications (As Defective) -237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
01-Jul-2024
Order On Applications (As Defective) -237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
14-Mar-2024
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
20-Feb-2024
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
28-Dec-2023
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
10-Oct-2023
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
21-Jun-2023
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
02-May-2023
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
18-Apr-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
18-Apr-2023
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
29-Nov-2022
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
07-Nov-2022
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
12-Oct-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
12-Oct-2022
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
13-Apr-2021
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
12-Apr-2021
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
09-Apr-2021
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
08-Apr-2021
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
07-Apr-2021
For Final Hearing -40
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani
-
10-Mar-2021
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra MaithaniView PDF
-
03-Mar-2021
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh
-
05-Oct-2020
Order On Applications (As Defective) -237
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh
-
02-Dec-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal SinghView PDF
-
28-Mar-2019
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
27-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/663/2019
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging ICAR's February 2018 order declining to upgrade Research Assistant pay scales at G.B. Pant University. The court held that ICAR's decision to limit liability to existing university pay scales and sanctioned budgets was neither unjust nor arbitrary, and that petitioners lacked any vested right to higher pay scales from the funding agency. Any such claims must be directed against the employer, not ICAR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts