MUKESH KUMAR vs MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - LALIT SAMANT — WPSS /845/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010043042026
Filing Number
WPSS /2279/2026
Filing Date
19-03-2026
Registration No
WPSS /845/2026
Registration Date
19-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
RETIREMENT BENEFITS ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUKESH KUMAR
Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL,SAGAR KUMAR,SAGAR KUMAR, ,SAGAR KUMAR
Respondent(s)
MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - LALIT SAMANT
REGIONAL MANAGER
Adv. LALIT SAMANT
ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
Adv. LALIT SAMANT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
The court disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, a retired driver of Uttarakhand Transport Corporation. Since the corporation admitted liability for the sanctioned leave encashment of Rs. 1,18,665, the court directed it to release the amount within eight weeks, with 9% per annum interest if payment is delayed beyond the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court disposed of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner, a retired driver of Uttarakhand Transport Corporation. Since the corporation admitted liability for the sanctioned leave encashment of Rs. 1,18,665, the court directed it to release the amount within eight weeks, with 9% per annum interest if payment is delayed beyond the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts