DWARIKA PRASAD vs GURUKUL KANGRI HARIDWAR Advocate - AJAY VEER PUNDIR — WPSB /160/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010043032026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSB /2278/2026

Filing Date

19-03-2026

Registration No

WPSB /160/2026

Registration Date

19-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

DWARIKA PRASAD

Adv. JAYVARDHAN KANDPAL

Respondent(s)

GURUKUL KANGRI HARIDWAR Advocate - AJAY VEER PUNDIR

VICE CHANCELLOR

Adv. AJAY VEER PUNDIR

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

23-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

23-03-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition without issuing a mandamus after the university's counsel assured the court that the sealed interview result for the Associate Professor (Chemistry) position would be opened before the Board of Management and duly notified, as pending litigation had previously prevented its declaration. The court accepted this undertaking and directed the university to comply with its counsel's statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition without issuing a mandamus after the university's counsel assured the court that the sealed interview result for the Associate Professor (Chemistry) position would be opened before the Board of Management and duly notified, as pending litigation had previously prevented its declaration. The court accepted this undertaking and directed the university to comply with its counsel's statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case