SHANKER RASTOGI AND ORS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528 /486/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 498A,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010042912026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C528 /2022/2026

Filing Date

19-03-2026

Registration No

C528 /486/2026

Registration Date

19-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 498A,323,504,506
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (Act No. 28 of 1961) Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

SHANKER RASTOGI AND ORS

Adv. PANKAJ SHARMA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

PREETI RASTOGI

Adv. AMIT KAPRI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

23-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

23-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Court Decision Summary The Uttarakhand High Court allowed a compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 920 of 2024 against Shanker Rastogi and others involving charges under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient grounds for compounding after both parties reconciled their dispute arising from misunderstandings and expressed willingness to restore peace and harmony, citing the Supreme Court principle that criminal proceedings can be quashed when parties settle amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Uttarakhand High Court allowed a compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 920 of 2024 against Shanker Rastogi and others involving charges under IPC Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found sufficient grounds for compounding after both parties reconciled their dispute arising from misunderstandings and expressed willingness to restore peace and harmony, citing the Supreme Court principle that criminal proceedings can be quashed when parties settle amicably. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (act No. 28 of 1961) All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case