THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD vs PRAYAG DATT RAI — WPMS/675/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010042902026

Filing Number

WPMS/2268/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPMS/675/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD

    Adv. SHAILABH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAYAG DATT RAI

  2. 2.ANEETA RAI

  3. 3.BASANTI DEVI

  4. 4.ASHOK SINGH

  5. 5.PRASHANT SINGH BORA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The High Court disposed of Oriental Insurance's writ petition challenging the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's order that had entertained a claim petition filed beyond the six-month limitation period under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court held that since the Supreme Court is seized of the identical issue in a pending Special Leave to Appeal, no useful purpose would be served by deciding the matter, and accordingly disposed of the petition with the direction that the tribunal's impugned order shall abide by the outcome of the Supreme Court's final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/675/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court disposed of Oriental Insurance's writ petition challenging the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's order that had entertained a claim petition filed beyond the six-month limitation period under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The court held that since the Supreme Court is seized of the identical issue in a pending Special Leave to Appeal, no useful purpose would be served by deciding the matter, and accordingly disposed of the petition with the direction that the tribunal's impugned order shall abide by the outcome of the Supreme Court's final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case