SACHIN KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528/485/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 304. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010042842026
Filing Number
C528/2020/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
C528/485/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SACHIN KUMAR
Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL,AVIDIT NOLIYAL, ,AVIDIT NOLIYAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.SHEELA
Adv. VISHAL VIKRAM SINGH
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Summary: The petition in Sachin Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand (C528 No. 485 of 2026) was admitted by Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani. The court rejected the compounding application filed by the parties, holding that since the case involves a death caused by the applicant, compounding cannot be entertained at this stage. The interim application was also deferred pending objections from the opposing side. The matter is adjourned to 17.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. C528/485/2026
Summary: The petition in Sachin Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand (C528 No. 485 of 2026) was admitted by Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani. The court rejected the compounding application filed by the parties, holding that since the case involves a death caused by the applicant, compounding cannot be entertained at this stage. The interim application was also deferred pending objections from the opposing side. The matter is adjourned to 17.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts