GOPAL BATRA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/673/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010042722026

Filing Number

WPMS/2259/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPMS/673/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MISC MATTERS ( 47 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 30-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL BATRA

    Adv. D N SHARMA,MANJU BAHUGUNA,MANJU BAHUGUNA, ,J P PANDEY,MANJU BAHUGUNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.THE BRANCH MANAGER

    Adv. DEVIKA TIWARI

  3. 3.THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.THE TEHSILDAR

    Adv. C.S.C.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition filed by Gopal Batra challenging bank recovery proceedings by allowing him to pay the outstanding amount of ₹5,86,841 in six equal monthly installments of ₹97,806.83 each, starting from 30.04.2026 and concluding by 30.09.2026. The court's decision was based on the petitioner's willingness to pay in installments and the bank's consent to this arrangement, with the condition that failure to pay any installment would allow the bank to recover the entire balance amount at once. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/673/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the writ petition filed by Gopal Batra challenging bank recovery proceedings by allowing him to pay the outstanding amount of ₹5,86,841 in six equal monthly installments of ₹97,806.83 each, starting from 30.04.2026 and concluding by 30.09.2026. The court's decision was based on the petitioner's willingness to pay in installments and the bank's consent to this arrangement, with the condition that failure to pay any installment would allow the bank to recover the entire balance amount at once. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case