RAKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528 /482/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 147,148,336,427,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 27th March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010042592026
Filing Number
C528 /2006/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Registration No
C528 /482/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL,AVIDIT NOLIYAL, ,AVIDIT NOLIYAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
RAJKAUR
Adv. VISHAL VIKRAM SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 27-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary: The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 1951 of 2024 against Satpal Singh and others, permitting the parties to compound offences under IPC Sections 147, 148, 336, 427, 504, and 506 based on their compromise settlement. Relying on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, the court held that non-compoundable offences can be compounded with court permission when parties have compromised and conviction is remote, as continuing proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the compounding application and quashed Criminal Case No. 1951 of 2024 against Satpal Singh and others, permitting the parties to compound offences under IPC Sections 147, 148, 336, 427, 504, and 506 based on their compromise settlement. Relying on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, the court held that non-compoundable offences can be compounded with court permission when parties have compromised and conviction is remote, as continuing proceedings would cause prejudice to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts