MOHIT DAS ALIAS ROHIT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/422/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: UKHC010042162026
Filing Number
BA1/1986/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
BA1/422/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHIT DAS ALIAS ROHIT
Adv. SIDDHANT MANRAL,HARSH RAUTELA,HARSH RAUTELA, HARSH RAUTELA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
-
2.RAJU VARMAN
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
22-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Case Summary: BA1/422/2026 The bail application of Mohit Das alias Rohit against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned. The court directed that the victim's 10th Class certificate be produced before the next hearing, fixed for 09.06.2026, to verify the victim's age at the time of the alleged incident. The applicant's counsel argued that the victim was nearly a major and the relationship was consensual. No bail decision was rendered on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra
-
18-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok MahraView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/422/2026
Case Summary: BA1/422/2026 The bail application of Mohit Das alias Rohit against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned. The court directed that the victim's 10th Class certificate be produced before the next hearing, fixed for 09.06.2026, to verify the victim's age at the time of the alleged incident. The applicant's counsel argued that the victim was nearly a major and the relationship was consensual. No bail decision was rendered on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts