JAGDISH CHANDRA PUROHIT vs VEER CHANDRA SINGH GARHWALI UTTARAKHAND UNIVERSITY Advocate - C K SHARMA — WPSB /83/2025
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010042072025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WPSB /2063/2025
Filing Date
27-03-2025
Registration No
WPSB /83/2025
Registration Date
27-03-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAGDISH CHANDRA PUROHIT
Adv. PIYUSH GARG
Respondent(s)
VEER CHANDRA SINGH GARHWALI UTTARAKHAND UNIVERSITY Advocate - C K SHARMA
CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER
Adv. C K SHARMA
PANKAJ BAHUGUNA
Adv. CHANDRA SHEKHAR DALAKOTI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 | |
| 03-12-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 13-08-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 05-06-2025 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 | |
| 23-04-2025 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
Orders
In WPSB No. 83 of 2025, the court granted the petitioner Jagdish Chandra Purohit four weeks' time to remove the defects pointed out by the Registry. The case has been adjourned and listed for further hearing thereafter, with the petitioner permitted to file a rejoinder-affidavit in response to the respondents' counter-affidavit if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In WPSB No. 83 of 2025, the court granted the petitioner Jagdish Chandra Purohit four weeks' time to remove the defects pointed out by the Registry. The case has been adjourned and listed for further hearing thereafter, with the petitioner permitted to file a rejoinder-affidavit in response to the respondents' counter-affidavit if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts