MADHURI RAWAT vs UTTARAKHAND SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION COMMISSION Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL, ,PRIYANKA AGRAWAL — WPSS/825/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010041652026
Filing Number
WPSS/2201/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPSS/825/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHURI RAWAT
Adv. VIKAS PANDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.UTTARAKHAND SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION COMMISSION Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL, ,PRIYANKA AGRAWAL
-
2.CHAIRMAN
Adv. SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL
Case History
-
30-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
Case adjourned. The Uttarakhand High Court granted the respondent Subordinate Services Selection Commission six weeks to file a counter affidavit in the writ petition filed by Madhuri Rawat challenging a sports quota appointment. The case is listed for next hearing on 30.05.2026, with a direction that any appointment made against the sports quota vacancy shall abide by the outcome of this petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/825/2026
Case adjourned. The Uttarakhand High Court granted the respondent Subordinate Services Selection Commission six weeks to file a counter affidavit in the writ petition filed by Madhuri Rawat challenging a sports quota appointment. The case is listed for next hearing on 30.05.2026, with a direction that any appointment made against the sports quota vacancy shall abide by the outcome of this petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts