MADHURI RAWAT vs UTTARAKHAND SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION COMMISSION Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL, ,PRIYANKA AGRAWAL — WPSS /825/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010041652026

Next Hearing

30th May 2026

Filing Number

WPSS /2201/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

WPSS /825/2026

Registration Date

18-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

MADHURI RAWAT

Adv. VIKAS PANDE

Respondent(s)

UTTARAKHAND SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION COMMISSION Advocate - SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL, ,PRIYANKA AGRAWAL

CHAIRMAN

Adv. SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

20-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

30-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Case adjourned. The Uttarakhand High Court granted the respondent Subordinate Services Selection Commission six weeks to file a counter affidavit in the writ petition filed by Madhuri Rawat challenging a sports quota appointment. The case is listed for next hearing on 30.05.2026, with a direction that any appointment made against the sports quota vacancy shall abide by the outcome of this petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case adjourned. The Uttarakhand High Court granted the respondent Subordinate Services Selection Commission six weeks to file a counter affidavit in the writ petition filed by Madhuri Rawat challenging a sports quota appointment. The case is listed for next hearing on 30.05.2026, with a direction that any appointment made against the sports quota vacancy shall abide by the outcome of this petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case