UMANG UNIYAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMB /172/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010040902026
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
Filing Number
WPMB /2168/2026
Filing Date
17-03-2026
Registration No
WPMB /172/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
WRIT PETITION RELATING TO CONTRACT/TENDER MATTER ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMANG UNIYAL
Adv. DHARMENDRA BARTHWAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
DIRECTORATE OF GEOLOGY AND MINING THROUGH DIRECTOR
Adv. C.S.C.
TENDER EVALUATION COMMITTEE
KISHAN SINGH NEGI
DISTRICT MINING OFFICER
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 31-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 27-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted interim relief to petitioner Umang Uniyal in a writ petition challenging a mining lease tender process. The court found the State's conduct arbitrary and mala fide, noting the petitioner's higher bid (₹22,01,000) was rejected while a lower bid (₹13,93,200) was accepted, allegedly due to deliberate non-issuance of a required No Dues Certificate. The court issued notice to respondent no. 4 and restrained officials from proceeding with the lower bid, directing counter affidavits be filed within the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand granted interim relief to petitioner Umang Uniyal in a writ petition challenging a mining lease tender process. The court found the State's conduct arbitrary and mala fide, noting the petitioner's higher bid (₹22,01,000) was rejected while a lower bid (₹13,93,200) was accepted, allegedly due to deliberate non-issuance of a required No Dues Certificate. The court issued notice to respondent no. 4 and restrained officials from proceeding with the lower bid, directing counter affidavits be filed within the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts