JITENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS vs R RAJESH Advocate - C.S.C. — CLCON/110/2025

Case under Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12. Disposed: --CLOSED on 27th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010039732025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CLCON/1941/2025

Filing Date

24-03-2025

Registration No

CLCON/110/2025

Registration Date

24-03-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court's Act,1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

JITENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS

Adv. AMAR MURTI SHUKLA,LATA NEGI,LATA NEGI, ANAND SINGH,LATA NEGI

Respondent(s)

R RAJESH Advocate - C.S.C.

ASHUTOSH SAYANA

Adv. C.S.C.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

26-03-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

27-04-2026

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

10-04-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

06-11-2025

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

16-10-2025

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

Orders

27-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand closed the contempt petition after finding that the state authorities had complied with the previous court order by constituting a selection committee under the Regularisation Rules, 2013 to consider the petitioners' claims for regularisation. The petitioners' claims were ultimately rejected by the competent authority, and since the petitioners chose not to pursue the matter further, the court closed the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand closed the contempt petition after finding that the state authorities had complied with the previous court order by constituting a selection committee under the Regularisation Rules, 2013 to consider the petitioners' claims for regularisation. The petitioners' claims were ultimately rejected by the competent authority, and since the petitioners chose not to pursue the matter further, the court closed the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case