SANSAR SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSS /775/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010039102026

Next Hearing

11th May 2026

Filing Number

WPSS /2076/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

WPSS /775/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

MISC ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SANSAR SINGH

Adv. Mohit Bhauryal,VIVEK KATHAIT,VIVEK KATHAIT, ,VIVEK KATHAIT

RAJAT RAWAT

RANJEET RAWAT

SAURAV SINGH RAWAT

HIMANSHU SAINI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

UTTARAKHAND SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION COMMISSION

Adv. SHAILENDRA NAURIYAL,PRIYANKA AGRAWAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

17-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

11-05-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

24-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

17-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
24-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Summary: The writ petition (WPSS/775/2026) filed by Sansar Singh against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned to 11.05.2026. The Selecting Body's counsel was directed to file a counter-affidavit within four weeks. The court permitted the appointment process to continue provisionally, with any appointment made subject to the final outcome of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The writ petition (WPSS/775/2026) filed by Sansar Singh against the State of Uttarakhand was adjourned to 11.05.2026. The Selecting Body's counsel was directed to file a counter-affidavit within four weeks. The court permitted the appointment process to continue provisionally, with any appointment made subject to the final outcome of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case