SUMIT JETHI vs NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD NAINITAL Advocate - BHUPENDRA BISHT — WPMB /98/2025

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 01st April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010038902025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMB /1888/2025

Filing Date

21-03-2025

Registration No

WPMB /98/2025

Registration Date

21-03-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

WRIT PETITION RELATING TO CONTRACT/TENDER MATTER ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SUMIT JETHI

Adv. VIPUL SHARMA,NIVESH BAHUGUNA,NIVESH BAHUGUNA, ,KHUSHBOO TIWARI SHARMA,MANEESH BISHT,NIVESH BAHUGUNA

Respondent(s)

NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD NAINITAL Advocate - BHUPENDRA BISHT

M/S THAKURJI ENTERPRISES

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

25-03-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

16-12-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

16-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

14-07-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

23-05-2025

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

Orders

01-04-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Sumit Jethi's writ petition challenging the Nagar Palika Parishad's rejection of his technical bid for a vehicle parking tender as infructuous, finding the relief claimed had become moot due to passage of time. The court did not address the merits of whether the bid evaluation was wrongful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed Sumit Jethi's writ petition challenging the Nagar Palika Parishad's rejection of his technical bid for a vehicle parking tender as infructuous, finding the relief claimed had become moot due to passage of time. The court did not address the merits of whether the bid evaluation was wrongful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case