GALIB vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPPIL/33/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010038132026

Filing Number

WPPIL/2025/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPPIL/33/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 45 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GALIB

    Adv. BILAL AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

  2. 2.COLLECTOR

    Adv. C.S.C.

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE

    Adv. C.S.C.

  4. 4.GRAM PANCHAYAT

  5. 5.SHAJHA

  6. 6.TAHIR

  7. 7.WAHEED

  8. 8.AFZAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the PIL seeking removal of encroachments from Gaon Sabha land in Haridwar. The court declined to undertake factual inquiry, noting that Section 112B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act prescribes a detailed statutory procedure for dispossessing persons in illegal possession of such land. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases As Defective -236

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPPIL/33/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the PIL seeking removal of encroachments from Gaon Sabha land in Haridwar. The court declined to undertake factual inquiry, noting that Section 112B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act prescribes a detailed statutory procedure for dispossessing persons in illegal possession of such land. The petition was disposed with liberty for the petitioner to pursue the appropriate statutory remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case