SARVESH KUMARI vs SUKHWANT KAUR Advocate - DEVANSHI JOSHI, ,VIVEK PATHAK — WPMS/872/2025

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010038042025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPMS/1850/2025

Filing Date

20-03-2025

Registration No

WPMS/872/2025

Registration Date

20-03-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF REVENUE COURT IN OTHER REVENUE CASES ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

SARVESH KUMARI

Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI,SUDHIR KUMAR,SUDHIR KUMAR, ,LALIT GOSWAMI,DEEPAK CHANDRA,SIDDHARTHA SINGH,KIRTI SHARAN AGARWAL,SUDHIR KUMAR

SUSHILA

Adv. SIDDHARTHA SINGH

BHARAT SHARMA

Adv. SIDDHARTHA SINGH

Respondent(s)

SUKHWANT KAUR Advocate - DEVANSHI JOSHI, ,VIVEK PATHAK

SIMARANDEEP SINGH

Adv. DEVANSHI JOSHI,VIVEK PATHAK

NARENDRA SHARMA

NITIN SHARMA

AMAN SHARMA

ADESH SHARMA

KAMLESH

GEETA SHARMA

SHUBHAM SHARMA

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Adv. C.S.C.

NAGAR NIGAM RUDRAPUR UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

Adv. VIPUL SHARMA

KOMIL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

21-03-2025

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

08-05-2026

AFTER FRESH MATTERS -128

28-04-2026

AFTER FRESH MATTERS -128

20-04-2026

JUST AFTER FRESH MATTERS -252

17-04-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

Orders

28-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Summary: In WPMS No. 872 of 2025, the court granted permission to Mr. Piyush Garg to withdraw his vakalatnama as the counsel for respondents 1 and 2. The case was adjourned to 08.05.2026 under the same head, and a cost of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on respondents 1 and 2, to be paid to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPMS No. 872 of 2025, the court granted permission to Mr. Piyush Garg to withdraw his vakalatnama as the counsel for respondents 1 and 2. The case was adjourned to 08.05.2026 under the same head, and a cost of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on respondents 1 and 2, to be paid to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case