SARVESH KUMARI vs SUKHWANT KAUR Advocate - DEVANSHI JOSHI, ,VIVEK PATHAK — WPMS/872/2025

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010038042025

Filing Number

WPMS/1850/2025

Filing Date

20-Mar-2025

Registration No

WPMS/872/2025

Registration Date

20-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF REVENUE COURT IN OTHER REVENUE CASES ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARVESH KUMARI

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI,SUDHIR KUMAR,SUDHIR KUMAR, ,LALIT GOSWAMI,DEEPAK CHANDRA,SIDDHARTHA SINGH,KIRTI SHARAN AGARWAL,SUDHIR KUMAR

  2. 2.SUSHILA

    Adv. SIDDHARTHA SINGH

  3. 3.BHARAT SHARMA

    Adv. SIDDHARTHA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKHWANT KAUR Advocate - DEVANSHI JOSHI, ,VIVEK PATHAK

  2. 2.SIMARANDEEP SINGH

    Adv. DEVANSHI JOSHI,VIVEK PATHAK

  3. 3.NARENDRA SHARMA

  4. 4.NITIN SHARMA

  5. 5.AMAN SHARMA

  6. 6.ADESH SHARMA

  7. 7.KAMLESH

  8. 8.GEETA SHARMA

  9. 9.SHUBHAM SHARMA

  10. 10.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

    Adv. C.S.C.

  11. 11.NAGAR NIGAM RUDRAPUR UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

    Adv. VIPUL SHARMA

  12. 12.KOMIL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    After Fresh Matters -128

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

    Summary: In WPMS No. 872 of 2025, the court granted permission to Mr. Piyush Garg to withdraw his vakalatnama as the counsel for respondents 1 and 2. The case was adjourned to 08.05.2026 under the same head, and a cost of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on respondents 1 and 2, to be paid to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    After Fresh Matters -128

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Just After Fresh Matters -252

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  7. 17-Apr-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  8. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  9. 15-Apr-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  10. 04-Apr-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  11. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  12. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  14. 13-Feb-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  15. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  17. 09-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  19. 07-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  20. 07-Aug-2025

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  22. 10-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  23. 25-Jun-2025

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  24. 09-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  25. 21-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 20-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/872/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In WPMS No. 872 of 2025, the court granted permission to Mr. Piyush Garg to withdraw his vakalatnama as the counsel for respondents 1 and 2. The case was adjourned to 08.05.2026 under the same head, and a cost of Rs. 5,000 was imposed on respondents 1 and 2, to be paid to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case