CHARANJEET SINGH vs CHIEF AGRICULTURE OFFICER Advocate - C.S.C. — WPMS /612/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010037932026
Filing Number
WPMS /2015/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
WPMS /612/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
MISC MATTERS ( 47 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHARANJEET SINGH
Adv. BALVINDER SINGH
GURMAIL SINGH
MANJEET SINGH
KEWAL SINGH
CHARAN KAUR
DALVEER SINGH
BALKAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
CHIEF AGRICULTURE OFFICER Advocate - C.S.C.
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE
Adv. C.S.C.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 18-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the District Magistrate's order restricting summer paddy cultivation in non-waterlogged fields, holding that such restrictions require statutory sanction and cannot be imposed without legal authority. The court allowed all writ petitions, permitting farmers to sow summer paddy in their fields based on their choice, regardless of waterlogging status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Uttarakhand quashed the District Magistrate's order restricting summer paddy cultivation in non-waterlogged fields, holding that such restrictions require statutory sanction and cannot be imposed without legal authority. The court allowed all writ petitions, permitting farmers to sow summer paddy in their fields based on their choice, regardless of waterlogging status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts