SHIVKUMAR vs MUKUL KUMAR SATI — CLCON/76/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010037732026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CLCON/2002/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

CLCON/76/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

SHIVKUMAR

Adv. M C PANT,ANUPRIYA KUKRETI,ANUPRIYA KUKRETI, ,ABHISHEK PANT,TULIKA SHARMA,ANUPRIYA KUKRETI

Respondent(s)

MUKUL KUMAR SATI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

16-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

02-06-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

13-05-2026

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

05-05-2026

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

02-04-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

Orders

05-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Case Summary: CLCON/76/2026 (Shivkumar v. Mukul Kumar Sati) The case was adjourned to 13.05.2026. The respondent, Mukul Kumar Sati (Director, Secondary Education, Uttarakhand), informed the court that a disposal order dated 20.03.2026 had already been passed in compliance with the court's previous order. The Standing Counsel was granted one week to file a compliance affidavit. Personal appearance of the officer concerned was exempted for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CLCON/76/2026 (Shivkumar v. Mukul Kumar Sati) The case was adjourned to 13.05.2026. The respondent, Mukul Kumar Sati (Director, Secondary Education, Uttarakhand), informed the court that a disposal order dated 20.03.2026 had already been passed in compliance with the court's previous order. The Standing Counsel was granted one week to file a compliance affidavit. Personal appearance of the officer concerned was exempted for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case