SHIVKUMAR vs MUKUL KUMAR SATI — CLCON/76/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010037732026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CLCON/2002/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
CLCON/76/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 6 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIVKUMAR
Adv. M C PANT,ANUPRIYA KUKRETI,ANUPRIYA KUKRETI, ,ABHISHEK PANT,TULIKA SHARMA,ANUPRIYA KUKRETI
Respondent(s)
MUKUL KUMAR SATI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 02-06-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 13-05-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
| 05-05-2026 | PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4 |
| 02-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Case Summary: CLCON/76/2026 (Shivkumar v. Mukul Kumar Sati) The case was adjourned to 13.05.2026. The respondent, Mukul Kumar Sati (Director, Secondary Education, Uttarakhand), informed the court that a disposal order dated 20.03.2026 had already been passed in compliance with the court's previous order. The Standing Counsel was granted one week to file a compliance affidavit. Personal appearance of the officer concerned was exempted for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CLCON/76/2026 (Shivkumar v. Mukul Kumar Sati) The case was adjourned to 13.05.2026. The respondent, Mukul Kumar Sati (Director, Secondary Education, Uttarakhand), informed the court that a disposal order dated 20.03.2026 had already been passed in compliance with the court's previous order. The Standing Counsel was granted one week to file a compliance affidavit. Personal appearance of the officer concerned was exempted for the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts