NAVNEET GOYAL Reema Rana(LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/375/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 65(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010036882026
Filing Number
BA1/1735/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
BA1/375/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NAVNEET GOYAL Reema Rana(LEGAL AID)
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDER MATTERS -17
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 30-04-2026 | ORDER MATTERS -17 |
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The court rejected the bail application of Navneet Goyal, who was accused of sexually assaulting a 9-year-old girl under Sections 65(2) of B.N.S. and Sections 5/6 of POCSO Act. The court found the crime heinous based on the serious allegations, the victim's tender age, and investigative statements indicating the accused's pattern of such behavior, thus denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the bail application of Navneet Goyal, who was accused of sexually assaulting a 9-year-old girl under Sections 65(2) of B.N.S. and Sections 5/6 of POCSO Act. The court found the crime heinous based on the serious allegations, the victim's tender age, and investigative statements indicating the accused's pattern of such behavior, thus denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts