P vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/173/2025

Case under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 3/4. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010036552025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRLA/1868/2025

Filing Date

18-03-2025

Registration No

CRLA/173/2025

Registration Date

18-03-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 3/4
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376(2),506

Petitioner(s)

P

Adv. PRIYANSHU GAIROLA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

20-03-2025

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

04-05-2026

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

19-11-2025

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

06-11-2025

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

13-08-2025

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

Orders

04-05-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

CRLA 173/2025 Summary: The court allowed the delay condonation application (IA No. 02/2026) filed by the Investigating Officer, who submitted her response to the show-cause notice with delay. The Investigating Officer's reply was taken on record. The matter was adjourned and listed before the Regular Bench after four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CRLA 173/2025 Summary: The court allowed the delay condonation application (IA No. 02/2026) filed by the Investigating Officer, who submitted her response to the show-cause notice with delay. The Investigating Officer's reply was taken on record. The matter was adjourned and listed before the Regular Bench after four weeks for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case