NAVI AHMED ALIAS NABIYA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/363/2026

Case under Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3/5/6/11(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010036042026

Filing Number

BA1/1688/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

BA1/363/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3/5/6/11(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAVI AHMED ALIAS NABIYA

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to applicant Navi Ahmed @ Nabiya, who was in judicial custody under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act. The court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of independent witnesses, absence of scientific evidence proving the recovered meat was cow meat, and clean criminal history. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/363/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to applicant Navi Ahmed @ Nabiya, who was in judicial custody under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act. The court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of independent witnesses, absence of scientific evidence proving the recovered meat was cow meat, and clean criminal history. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case