NAVI AHMED ALIAS NABIYA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1 /363/2026

Case under Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3/5/6/11(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010036042026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1 /1688/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

BA1 /363/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 (Act No. 06 of 2007) Section 3/5/6/11(1)

Petitioner(s)

NAVI AHMED ALIAS NABIYA

Adv. VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

12-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to applicant Navi Ahmed @ Nabiya, who was in judicial custody under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act. The court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of independent witnesses, absence of scientific evidence proving the recovered meat was cow meat, and clean criminal history. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to applicant Navi Ahmed @ Nabiya, who was in judicial custody under the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act. The court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of independent witnesses, absence of scientific evidence proving the recovered meat was cow meat, and clean criminal history. The applicant was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case