MAHESHANAND GAUD vs GOPI ALIAS BHASKAR — SA/25/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

CNR: UKHC010035172026

Filing Number

SA/1883/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

SA/25/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHANAND GAUD

    Adv. MOHD MATLUB,MANOKAM NAUTIYAL,MANOKAM NAUTIYAL, ,MANOKAM NAUTIYAL

  2. 2.SRIBILASH GAUD

  3. 3.SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR

  4. 4.SHRI SUNIL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPI ALIAS BHASKAR

  2. 2.SMT MANORAMA DEVI

  3. 3.SMT RUBI CHAUDHARY

  4. 4.SMT PRACHI NEGI

  5. 5.SMT PUJA RAWAT

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jul-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  3. 09-Jul-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

    Case Summary: SA 25/2026 Outcome: Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 09.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. The second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's decree granting permanent injunction to the property owner. The trial court had decided 15 issues in favor of the plaintiff/appellant, but the appellate court dismissed the suit despite not disturbing the trial court's findings. The High Court admitted the appeal on two key questions: whether the plaintiff, as owner in settled possession since 1999, was entitled to permanent injunction relief, and whether injunction relief can be sought between co-owners of jointly-held land. Trial court records were summoned and notice issued to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/25/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA 25/2026 Outcome: Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 09.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. The second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's decree granting permanent injunction to the property owner. The trial court had decided 15 issues in favor of the plaintiff/appellant, but the appellate court dismissed the suit despite not disturbing the trial court's findings. The High Court admitted the appeal on two key questions: whether the plaintiff, as owner in settled possession since 1999, was entitled to permanent injunction relief, and whether injunction relief can be sought between co-owners of jointly-held land. Trial court records were summoned and notice issued to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case