MAHESHANAND GAUD vs GOPI ALIAS BHASKAR — SA/25/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. 5 of 1908) Section 100. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: UKHC010035172026
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
SA/1883/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
SA/25/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
SECOND APPEAL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESHANAND GAUD
Adv. MOHD MATLUB,MANOKAM NAUTIYAL,MANOKAM NAUTIYAL, ,MANOKAM NAUTIYAL
SRIBILASH GAUD
SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR
SHRI SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
GOPI ALIAS BHASKAR
SMT MANORAMA DEVI
SMT RUBI CHAUDHARY
SMT PRACHI NEGI
SMT PUJA RAWAT
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 |
| 09-07-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 09-07-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 07-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Case Summary: SA 25/2026 Outcome: Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 09.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. The second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's decree granting permanent injunction to the property owner. The trial court had decided 15 issues in favor of the plaintiff/appellant, but the appellate court dismissed the suit despite not disturbing the trial court's findings. The High Court admitted the appeal on two key questions: whether the plaintiff, as owner in settled possession since 1999, was entitled to permanent injunction relief, and whether injunction relief can be sought between co-owners of jointly-held land. Trial court records were summoned and notice issued to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SA 25/2026 Outcome: Appeal admitted on substantial questions of law; case adjourned to 09.07.2026 with status quo maintained on property possession. The second appeal challenges the First Appellate Court's reversal of the trial court's decree granting permanent injunction to the property owner. The trial court had decided 15 issues in favor of the plaintiff/appellant, but the appellate court dismissed the suit despite not disturbing the trial court's findings. The High Court admitted the appeal on two key questions: whether the plaintiff, as owner in settled possession since 1999, was entitled to permanent injunction relief, and whether injunction relief can be sought between co-owners of jointly-held land. Trial court records were summoned and notice issued to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts