ANMOL SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1 /352/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/20. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010034442026
Filing Number
BA1 /1594/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
BA1 /352/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANMOL SINGH
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR CHANDEL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDER MATTERS -17
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 06-04-2026 | ORDER MATTERS -17 | |
| 25-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Anmol Singh, accused under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act, 1985, finding sufficient grounds at the preliminary stage due to ambiguity regarding the exact nature and quantity of the seized substance. The court noted that the recovery memo's description of the material as containing seeds and non-qualifying parts creates a debatable issue about whether it meets the strict statutory definition of "ganja," thus creating reasonable doubt about the applicability of commercial quantity provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Anmol Singh, accused under Sections 8/20 of the NDPS Act, 1985, finding sufficient grounds at the preliminary stage due to ambiguity regarding the exact nature and quantity of the seized substance. The court noted that the recovery memo's description of the material as containing seeds and non-qualifying parts creates a debatable issue about whether it meets the strict statutory definition of "ganja," thus creating reasonable doubt about the applicability of commercial quantity provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts