SRI BHAGWATI PRASAD SHARMA (RETIRED JUNIOR ENGINEER)(Legal Heir) vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, UTTARAKHAND PAY JAL — WPSS/2613/2017

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Sep-2017

CNR: UKHC010033742017

Filing Number

WPSS/1012660/2017

Filing Date

08-Sep-2017

Registration No

WPSS/2613/2017

Registration Date

08-Sep-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RETIREMENT BENIFITS ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

22-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI BHAGWATI PRASAD SHARMA (RETIRED JUNIOR ENGINEER)(Legal Heir)

    Adv. JITENDRA CHAUDHARY,Anant Dhaka,Anant Dhaka, Anant Dhaka1.

  2. 2.Madhu Sharma1.

  3. 3.Neeraj Sharma1.

  4. 4.Piyush Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, UTTARAKHAND PAY JAL

    Adv. ,D S PATNI,C.S.C. 1123

  2. 2.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTTARAKHAND PAY JAL SANSADHAN VIKAS AND NIRMAN NIGAM

  3. 3.DIRECTOR (FINANCE) UTTARAKHAND PAY JAL SANSADHAN VIKAS AND NIRMAN NIGAM

  4. 4.THE CHIEF ENGINEER (M) UTTARAKHAND PAY JAL SANSADHAN VIKAS AND NIRMAN NIGAM

  5. 5.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CONSTRUCTION DIVISION, UTTARAKHAND PAY JAL NIGAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

    The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a ₹3,58,990 recovery order passed against a retired Junior Engineer without proper hearing, directing the Managing Director to decide the petitioner's claim of double deduction within six weeks if representation is filed within two weeks. The court accepted the respondent's assurance to address the grievance according to law, effectively allowing the substantive issue to be determined by administrative review rather than judicial decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Dec-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  4. 12-Sep-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  5. 12-Jul-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  6. 21-May-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  7. 21-May-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  8. 18-Mar-2024

    For Final Hearing (After Fresh) -45

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  9. 14-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  10. 14-Mar-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  11. 22-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  12. 22-Feb-2024

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  13. 30-Nov-2023

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit

  14. 29-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF

  15. 29-Nov-2023

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  16. 21-Sep-2023

    For Final Hearing -40

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  17. 02-Aug-2023

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

  18. 22-May-2023

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

  19. 20-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  20. 15-Nov-2021

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sharad Kumar SharmaView PDF

  21. 13-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Lok Pal SinghView PDF

  22. 04-Apr-2018

    Admission Matters -25

  23. 06-Oct-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  24. 06-Oct-2017

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF

  25. 06-Oct-2017

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

  26. 19-Sep-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 08-Sep-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPSS/2613/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petition challenging a ₹3,58,990 recovery order passed against a retired Junior Engineer without proper hearing, directing the Managing Director to decide the petitioner's claim of double deduction within six weeks if representation is filed within two weeks. The court accepted the respondent's assurance to address the grievance according to law, effectively allowing the substantive issue to be determined by administrative review rather than judicial decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case