SHRI MURLIDHAR SHARMA vs M/S GOVIND BHAWAN OFFICE — WPMS/539/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010033102026

Filing Number

WPMS/1763/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPMS/539/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 30-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI MURLIDHAR SHARMA

    Adv. DILEEP CHANDRA MATHUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S GOVIND BHAWAN OFFICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    The court allowed the writ petition and held that whether the plaintiff is an authorized representative of the society to institute the suit is a question of fact and law that cannot be determined under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court directed the trial court to proceed with the case by framing a preliminary issue on the plaintiff's locus standi and deciding it independently before proceeding with other issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/539/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the writ petition and held that whether the plaintiff is an authorized representative of the society to institute the suit is a question of fact and law that cannot be determined under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court directed the trial court to proceed with the case by framing a preliminary issue on the plaintiff's locus standi and deciding it independently before proceeding with other issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case