SHRI MURLIDHAR SHARMA vs M/S GOVIND BHAWAN OFFICE — WPMS /539/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010033102026
Filing Number
WPMS /1763/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
WPMS /539/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI MURLIDHAR SHARMA
Adv. DILEEP CHANDRA MATHUR
Respondent(s)
M/S GOVIND BHAWAN OFFICE
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236 | |
| 25-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 18-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The court allowed the writ petition and held that whether the plaintiff is an authorized representative of the society to institute the suit is a question of fact and law that cannot be determined under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court directed the trial court to proceed with the case by framing a preliminary issue on the plaintiff's locus standi and deciding it independently before proceeding with other issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the writ petition and held that whether the plaintiff is an authorized representative of the society to institute the suit is a question of fact and law that cannot be determined under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court directed the trial court to proceed with the case by framing a preliminary issue on the plaintiff's locus standi and deciding it independently before proceeding with other issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts