STATE OF UTTARAKHAND G.A. vs SUDESH ALIAS SARVESH Advocate - NIRANJAN BHATT — SPLA/30/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010032382026

Filing Number

SPLA/1509/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

SPLA/30/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

GOVERNMENT APPEAL/LEAVE TO APPEAL ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND G.A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUDESH ALIAS SARVESH Advocate - NIRANJAN BHATT

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    In SPLA No. 30 of 2026, the State of Uttarakhand filed a petition against respondent Sudesh Alias Sarvesh. On 04.05.2026, the court noted that notice was personally served on the respondent but no representation appeared. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing after two weeks along with a connected matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Time Barred (Fresh Cases) -247

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SPLA/30/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In SPLA No. 30 of 2026, the State of Uttarakhand filed a petition against respondent Sudesh Alias Sarvesh. On 04.05.2026, the court noted that notice was personally served on the respondent but no representation appeared. The case was adjourned and listed for hearing after two weeks along with a connected matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case