NASEEM AHMAD RAJVEER SINGH vs RACHNA GUPTA Advocate - NIKHIL SINGHAL, ,SAMEER RAWAT — CLR/17/2026

Case under Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 (Act No. 9 of 1887) Section 25. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

Next hearing 29-May-2026

CNR: UKHC010032102026

Filing Number

CLR/1716/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

CLR/17/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

REVISIONS ( 4 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION 25 PROVISO OF PROVINCIAL SMALL CAUSE COURT ACT,1887 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 17-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 (Act No. 9 of 1887) Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASEEM AHMAD RAJVEER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RACHNA GUPTA Advocate - NIKHIL SINGHAL, ,SAMEER RAWAT

Case History

  1. 29-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-May-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  3. 15-May-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Revision Petition No. 17 of 2026, Hon'ble Judge Subhash Upadhyay adjourned the case for further hearing. The matter is listed for 15.05.2026 at the request of the revisionist's counsel. Both parties were represented by their respective learned counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash UpadhyayView PDF

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLR/17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Revision Petition No. 17 of 2026, Hon'ble Judge Subhash Upadhyay adjourned the case for further hearing. The matter is listed for 15.05.2026 at the request of the revisionist's counsel. Both parties were represented by their respective learned counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case