KHADAK SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL/395/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: UKHC010031372026

Filing Number

WPCRL/1465/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPCRL/395/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

FIR QUASHING ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHADAK SINGH

    Adv. B S NEGI,SIDDHARTH SINGH NEGI,SIDDHARTH SINGH NEGI, ,SIDDHARTH SINGH NEGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. G.A.

  3. 3.BIRENDRA SINGH

    Adv. NIVESH BAHUGUNA,VIRENDRA SINGH RAWAT

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-May-2026

    Orders On Applications -22

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

    Case Summary: WPCRL 395/2026 (Khadak Singh v. State of Uttarakhand) The matter was adjourned to 14.05.2026 on the request of the Additional Advocate General for the State. The court directed the Fishery Department to conduct a discreet inquiry into the allegations raised in the petition. The interim order previously granted continues in effect pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh ThapliyalView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPCRL/395/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPCRL 395/2026 (Khadak Singh v. State of Uttarakhand) The matter was adjourned to 14.05.2026 on the request of the Additional Advocate General for the State. The court directed the Fishery Department to conduct a discreet inquiry into the allegations raised in the petition. The interim order previously granted continues in effect pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case