GURDEV SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS /510/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010031302026
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
Filing Number
WPMS /1670/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
WPMS /510/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE ORDER OF MISC MATTER ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GURDEV SINGH
Adv. S K MANDAL
SUKHDEV SINGH
DARSHAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
PAL SINGH
SATPAL SINGH
RANJEET SINGH
FAUJA SINGH
SMT VIRMO BAI
SMT LAXMI BAI
RAMESH CHANDRA
NIHAL SINGH
MANGAL SINGH
SMT REKHA
GURMEL SINGH
GURMUKH SINGH
SMT VIRMAL KAUR
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 11-05-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
Summary: In WPMS No. 510 of 2026, the court adjourned the matter to 11.05.2026 for further hearing. The petitioners challenged the Collector's order cancelling their father's lease and vesting the land in the State Government, arguing the land held bhumidhari status with non-transferrable rights. The respondent was granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit, and parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding possession of the property until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In WPMS No. 510 of 2026, the court adjourned the matter to 11.05.2026 for further hearing. The petitioners challenged the Collector's order cancelling their father's lease and vesting the land in the State Government, arguing the land held bhumidhari status with non-transferrable rights. The respondent was granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit, and parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding possession of the property until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts