GURDEV SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/510/2026
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
CNR: UKHC010031302026
Filing Number
WPMS/1670/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPMS/510/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
AGAINST THE ORDER OF MISC MATTER ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Last updated 30-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GURDEV SINGH
Adv. S K MANDAL
-
2.SUKHDEV SINGH
-
3.DARSHAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
-
2.PAL SINGH
-
3.SATPAL SINGH
-
4.RANJEET SINGH
-
5.FAUJA SINGH
-
6.SMT VIRMO BAI
-
7.SMT LAXMI BAI
-
8.RAMESH CHANDRA
-
9.NIHAL SINGH
-
10.MANGAL SINGH
-
11.SMT REKHA
-
12.GURMEL SINGH
-
13.GURMUKH SINGH
-
14.SMT VIRMAL KAUR
Case History
-
11-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-May-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
Summary: In WPMS No. 510 of 2026, the court adjourned the matter to 11.05.2026 for further hearing. The petitioners challenged the Collector's order cancelling their father's lease and vesting the land in the State Government, arguing the land held bhumidhari status with non-transferrable rights. The respondent was granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit, and parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding possession of the property until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPMS/510/2026
Summary: In WPMS No. 510 of 2026, the court adjourned the matter to 11.05.2026 for further hearing. The petitioners challenged the Collector's order cancelling their father's lease and vesting the land in the State Government, arguing the land held bhumidhari status with non-transferrable rights. The respondent was granted four weeks to file a counter affidavit, and parties are directed to maintain status quo regarding possession of the property until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts