FAISAL QURESHI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/302/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22/60. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010029682026

Filing Number

BA1/1399/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

BA1/302/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22/60

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAISAL QURESHI

    Adv. SHEETAL SELWAL,SUNNY KUMAR,SUNNY KUMAR, ,SUNNY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Faisal Qureshi, who was in judicial custody on narcotic drugs charges under the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of independent witnesses to the alleged recovery and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/302/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Faisal Qureshi, who was in judicial custody on narcotic drugs charges under the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found merit in the applicant's arguments regarding lack of independent witnesses to the alleged recovery and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case