RAAVISH MOHD. SHAFY, VINAY BHATT,CHETNA LATWAL,NIPUSH MOLA JOSHI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /101/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (act No. 2 of 1974) Section 374(2). Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

CNR: UKHC010029032024

Next Hearing

01st June 2026

Filing Number

CRLR /1566/2024

Filing Date

01-03-2024

Registration No

CRLA /101/2024

Registration Date

01-03-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 374(2)

Petitioner(s)

RAAVISH MOHD. SHAFY, VINAY BHATT,CHETNA LATWAL,NIPUSH MOLA JOSHI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

04-03-2024

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

01-06-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

12-02-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS (AFTER FRESH) -23

25-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

03-09-2025

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS (AFTER FRESH) -23

Orders

23-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand rejected the bail application of Raavish, who was convicted under Section 376(2)(n) and Sections 5(l)/6 and 5(j)(ii)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, for deceiving a minor victim into a sexual relationship under false pretense of marriage while already being married. The court found no grounds to grant post-conviction bail, noting the victim's testimony confirmed the appellant concealed material facts including his marital status and different religion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Uttarakhand rejected the bail application of Raavish, who was convicted under Section 376(2)(n) and Sections 5(l)/6 and 5(j)(ii)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, for deceiving a minor victim into a sexual relationship under false pretense of marriage while already being married. The court found no grounds to grant post-conviction bail, noting the victim's testimony confirmed the appellant concealed material facts including his marital status and different religion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case