NARESH KUMAR SARITA BISHT, ,PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C482/386/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 498-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

CNR: UKHC010028532021

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

C482/1539/2021

Filing Date

03-03-2021

Registration No

C482/386/2021

Registration Date

03-03-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

04th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Act No. 2 of 1974) Section 498-A

Petitioner(s)

NARESH KUMAR SARITA BISHT, ,PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL

ARUN KUMAR

Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL

KUMARI RANJEETA

Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL

SATESHWARI DEVI

Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

JYOTI DEVI

Adv. D C S RAWAT,R K CHAUHAN

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

04-03-2021

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

04-05-2026

FOR FINAL HEARING -40

29-11-2023

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

01-11-2023

PERSONAL APPEARANCE -4

29-09-2023

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS (AFTER FRESH) -23

Orders

04-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Mahra

The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three of five applicants (the husband's brother, sister, and mother) in a dowry and cruelty case arising from matrimonial discord, finding allegations against them were general and non-specific without attributing individual roles. However, proceedings against applicant no.1 (the husband) were allowed to continue as specific allegations were made against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against three of five applicants (the husband's brother, sister, and mother) in a dowry and cruelty case arising from matrimonial discord, finding allegations against them were general and non-specific without attributing individual roles. However, proceedings against applicant no.1 (the husband) were allowed to continue as specific allegations were made against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case