SURINDER KAUR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMS/460/2026

Case under Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Next hearing 06-Apr-2026

CNR: UKHC010028102026

Filing Number

WPMS/1480/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPMS/460/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIVIL COURT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 30-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Article 227 of the Constituion of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURINDER KAUR

    Adv. SANPREET SINGH AJMANI,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA, ,BHAVYA PRATAP SINGH RAUTELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

  2. 2.ZILA STARIYA VIKAS PRADHIKARAN

    Adv. SANDEEP KOTHARI

  3. 3.CHANDAN SINGH BISHT

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

    In WPMS No. 460 of 2026 before Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J., the case was adjourned on 23.03.2026 on the request of the petitioner's counsel. The matter has been listed for fresh hearing on 06.04.2026, with all three parties (petitioner, respondent no.1, and respondent no.2) represented through their respective counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPMS/460/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In WPMS No. 460 of 2026 before Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J., the case was adjourned on 23.03.2026 on the request of the petitioner's counsel. The matter has been listed for fresh hearing on 06.04.2026, with all three parties (petitioner, respondent no.1, and respondent no.2) represented through their respective counsels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case