ADITYA KUMAR SONI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — WPCRL /360/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22(c)/29. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS on 31st March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010025902026
Filing Number
WPCRL /1250/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
WPCRL /360/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )
Sub-Category
FIR QUASHING ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADITYA KUMAR SONI
Adv. GAURAV SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
Adv. SHOBHIT SAHARIA
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -35
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 30-03-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -35 | |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 25-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 24-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
In WPCRL No. 360 of 2026, Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the NCB's counsel informed the court that nothing has been found against the petitioner. Since the grounds for the petition no longer existed, the court found the petition to be without purpose and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In WPCRL No. 360 of 2026, Hon'ble Justice Rakesh Thapliyal dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the NCB's counsel informed the court that nothing has been found against the petitioner. Since the grounds for the petition no longer existed, the court found the petition to be without purpose and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts