TRILOK SINGH vs SMT. AFROJ JHA Advocate - SHARIQ KHURSHID — AO/333/2015

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 20th October 2022.

CNR: UKHC010024732015

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

27th July 2015

Filing Number

AO/1006671/2015

Filing Date

17-06-2015

Registration No

AO/333/2015

Registration Date

17-06-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

UNDER SECTION173 MOTOR VEHICLE ACT 1988 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

20th October 2022

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Act No. 59 of 1988) Section 173

Petitioner(s)

TRILOK SINGH

Adv. VIPUL SHARMA,TARUN PANDE,TARUN PANDE, ,TARUN PANDE

Respondent(s)

SMT. AFROJ JHA Advocate - SHARIQ KHURSHID

KM. MANTASA (MINOR)

MASTER MOHHD. ANAS (MINOR)

KM. ARUBE SAH (MINOR)

NABI AHAMAD

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Adv. ADITYA KUMAR ARYA

AJAY CHOBE

SHAKUL NABI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

20-10-2022

ORDER MATTERS -17

19-10-2022

ORDER MATTERS -17

11-12-2021

ORDER MATTERS (TO REFER FOR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT) -15

14-12-2019

ORDER MATTERS -17

07-12-2019

ORDER MATTERS -17

Orders

21-05-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani

The court granted appellant Trilok Singh's counsel permission to withdraw his Vakalatnama (power of attorney), noting that advocates are free to appear or not appear in cases. The matter was adjourned to 02.07.2026 to allow the appellant time to be informed of this development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted appellant Trilok Singh's counsel permission to withdraw his Vakalatnama (power of attorney), noting that advocates are free to appear or not appear in cases. The matter was adjourned to 02.07.2026 to allow the appellant time to be informed of this development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case