ATUL SINGH vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — WPMB /106/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010024552026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPMS /1276/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

WPMB /106/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MISC WRIT PETITION ( 2 )

Sub-Category

ADMISSIONS IN MEDICAL, NURSING, PARA-MEDICAL COURSES ( 82 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

ATUL SINGH

Adv. PRABHA NAITHANI,AVIDIT NOLIYAL,AVIDIT NOLIYAL, ,AVIDIT NOLIYAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

THE DEAN

Adv. PARIKSHIT SAINI

REGISTRAR

Adv. PARIKSHIT SAINI

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

24-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

23-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

19-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

12-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

23-03-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the petition filed by Atul Singh seeking a mandamus to accept his MBBS course withdrawal and refund his fees due to serious health issues. Though the UGC's 30-day refund deadline had expired, the court permitted the petitioner to file a complaint under the UGC Grievance Redressal Regulations, 2012, which shall be decided expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Uttarakhand disposed of the petition filed by Atul Singh seeking a mandamus to accept his MBBS course withdrawal and refund his fees due to serious health issues. Though the UGC's 30-day refund deadline had expired, the court permitted the petitioner to file a complaint under the UGC Grievance Redressal Regulations, 2012, which shall be decided expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case