BUHSRAN RANA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1 /251/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310,331(4),3(5),317(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010024352026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1 /1170/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

BA1 /251/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310,331(4),3(5),317(3)
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 3/25/4/25

Petitioner(s)

BUHSRAN RANA

Adv. BILAL AHMED

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

19-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

25-03-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

16-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

25-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Bushran Rana, accused of dacoity involving ₹1,00,000 and jewellery theft. The court found that Rana was not named in the FIR, not identified by the eyewitness, and no Test Identification Parade was conducted, making it impossible to conclusively establish his role as mastermind at this stage. He was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Bushran Rana, accused of dacoity involving ₹1,00,000 and jewellery theft. The court found that Rana was not named in the FIR, not identified by the eyewitness, and no Test Identification Parade was conducted, making it impossible to conclusively establish his role as mastermind at this stage. He was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case