BUHSRAN RANA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/251/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310,331(4),3(5),317(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: UKHC010024352026

Filing Number

BA1/1170/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

BA1/251/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310,331(4),3(5),317(3)
Arms Act, 1959 (Act No. 54 of 1959) Section 3/25/4/25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUHSRAN RANA

    Adv. BILAL AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Bushran Rana, accused of dacoity involving ₹1,00,000 and jewellery theft. The court found that Rana was not named in the FIR, not identified by the eyewitness, and no Test Identification Parade was conducted, making it impossible to conclusively establish his role as mastermind at this stage. He was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Order Matters -17

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA1/251/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Bushran Rana, accused of dacoity involving ₹1,00,000 and jewellery theft. The court found that Rana was not named in the FIR, not identified by the eyewitness, and no Test Identification Parade was conducted, making it impossible to conclusively establish his role as mastermind at this stage. He was ordered released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case