AMJAD vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND — BA1 /243/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),127(2),137(2),352,64(2) (M). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010023852026
Filing Number
BA1 /1143/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
BA1 /243/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMJAD
Adv. PRANAV SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ORDER MATTERS -17
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 08-04-2026 | ORDER MATTERS -17 | |
| 16-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Amjad, a 22-year-old accused of aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the BNS 2023 and POCSO Act. The court found that contradictions in the victim's statements and General Diary entries regarding the consensual nature of the relationship warranted deeper scrutiny at trial, and without expressing any opinion on the merits, determined the applicant had made out a case for bail. He was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Amjad, a 22-year-old accused of aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the BNS 2023 and POCSO Act. The court found that contradictions in the victim's statements and General Diary entries regarding the consensual nature of the relationship warranted deeper scrutiny at trial, and without expressing any opinion on the merits, determined the applicant had made out a case for bail. He was released on personal bond with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts