ANITA PANDEY vs DR SAURABH GHARWAR MANAGING DIRECTOR — CLCON/37/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

Next hearing 04-Apr-2026

CNR: UKHC010023762026

Filing Number

CLCON/1236/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

CLCON/37/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 6 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST FINAL ORDER ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Act No. 70 of 1971) Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANITA PANDEY

    Adv. ANAND KUMAR PANDEY,JAGDISH CHANDRA JOSHI,JAGDISH CHANDRA JOSHI, ,JAGDISH CHANDRA JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DR SAURABH GHARWAR MANAGING DIRECTOR

  2. 2.MR PURAN SINGH RANA

    Adv. VIPUL SHARMA

  3. 3.DR KARAN NEGI

    Adv. VIPUL SHARMA

Case History

  1. 04-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Personal Appearance -4

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

    Summary: In CLCON No. 37 of 2026, the case was adjourned to 04.04.2026. Respondent No. 1's counsel was granted one week's time to file a compliance affidavit regarding the previous order dated 07.11.2025, while a dispute concerning EPF raised by the petitioner remains pending. Personal appearance of Respondent No. 1 was dispensed with due to election duty obligations in Tamil Nadu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Cases For Admission -3

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar VermaView PDF

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CLCON/37/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In CLCON No. 37 of 2026, the case was adjourned to 04.04.2026. Respondent No. 1's counsel was granted one week's time to file a compliance affidavit regarding the previous order dated 07.11.2025, while a dispute concerning EPF raised by the petitioner remains pending. Personal appearance of Respondent No. 1 was dispensed with due to election duty obligations in Tamil Nadu. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case