ASHISH BARHTWAL vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/64/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: UKHC010022902026

Filing Number

CRLA/1116/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLA/64/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. UPTO 10 YEARS & FINE ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act No. 26 of 1881) Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHISH BARHTWAL

    Adv. DEVENDRA SINGH,RAJ KUMAR SINGH,RAJ KUMAR SINGH, ,RAJ KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

  2. 2.PRATIBHA GODIYAL

Case History

  1. 04-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Admission Matters -25

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

    The case SPLA No. 20 of 2026 with CRLA No. 64 of 2026 (Ashish Barthwal v. State of Uttarakhand) has been adjourned to 04.05.2026. The court directed the appellant's counsel to furnish the complete and correct address of the respondent, as the notice previously issued remained unserved due to incomplete address details. Upon receipt of correct particulars, a fresh notice shall be issued to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLA/64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case SPLA No. 20 of 2026 with CRLA No. 64 of 2026 (Ashish Barthwal v. State of Uttarakhand) has been adjourned to 04.05.2026. The court directed the appellant's counsel to furnish the complete and correct address of the respondent, as the notice previously issued remained unserved due to incomplete address details. Upon receipt of correct particulars, a fresh notice shall be issued to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case