SANDEEP vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/236/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(3),65(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010022812026
Filing Number
BA1/1108/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
BA1/236/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANDEEP
Adv. MANVENDRA SINGH,PRANAV SINGH,PRANAV SINGH, ,PRANAV SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sandeep, accused of kidnapping a minor girl, illegal marriage, and rape under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act, primarily because the victim denied the prosecution's allegations in her in-camera testimony before the trial court. The court found it a fit case for bail based on the victim's categorical denial of being drugged, abducted, or sexually assaulted, and directed his release on personal bond with two sureties on condition of cooperating with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/236/2026
The Uttarakhand High Court granted bail to Sandeep, accused of kidnapping a minor girl, illegal marriage, and rape under BNS 2023 and POCSO Act, primarily because the victim denied the prosecution's allegations in her in-camera testimony before the trial court. The court found it a fit case for bail based on the victim's categorical denial of being drugged, abducted, or sexually assaulted, and directed his release on personal bond with two sureties on condition of cooperating with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts