ARSHI vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA /62/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010022432026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRLA /1081/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

CRLA /62/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 3 )

Sub-Category

R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985) Section 8/22

Petitioner(s)

ARSHI

Adv. AYUSH AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

17-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

01-04-2026

ORDERS ON APPLICATIONS -22

25-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

01-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah

Summary: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of appellant Arshi, who was convicted under Section 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court found serious procedural irregularities in the prosecution's case—specifically, that FIR numbers appeared on documents (check list, specimen seal, arrest memo) prepared at the recovery spot before the FIR was lodged—and suspended the sentence execution pending appeal. Arshi is released on bail with personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed the bail application of appellant Arshi, who was convicted under Section 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court found serious procedural irregularities in the prosecution's case—specifically, that FIR numbers appeared on documents (check list, specimen seal, arrest memo) prepared at the recovery spot before the FIR was lodged—and suspended the sentence execution pending appeal. Arshi is released on bail with personal bond and two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case