MANSI KUMAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C. — WPSB /71/2026

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: UKHC010022202026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPSB /1153/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

WPSB /71/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

MANSI KUMAR

Adv. VINAY KUMAR,ANKIT BISHT,ANKIT BISHT, ,ANKIT BISHT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - C.S.C.

SECRETARY

Adv. C.S.C.

UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Adv. PANKAJ MIGLANI,MENKA TRIPATHI

NATIONAL FORENSIC SCIENCES UNIVERSITY

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

17-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

25-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

17-02-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay
23-03-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta,Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subhash Upadhyay

Case Adjourned for Further Submissions In WPSB/71/2026, the Uttarakhand High Court adjourned the petition filed by Mansi Kumar challenging an Equivalence Committee decision. The court granted the respondents three weeks to file a counter affidavit regarding whether the committee considered the petitioner's syllabus, with the petitioner to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter. The case is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned for Further Submissions In WPSB/71/2026, the Uttarakhand High Court adjourned the petition filed by Mansi Kumar challenging an Equivalence Committee decision. The court granted the respondents three weeks to file a counter affidavit regarding whether the committee considered the petitioner's syllabus, with the petitioner to file a rejoinder within one week thereafter. The case is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case