GAURAV RAWAT vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — CRLA/91/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 376,506. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: UKHC010021292025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRLA/1059/2025
Filing Date
19-02-2025
Registration No
CRLA/91/2025
Registration Date
19-02-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
APPEAL ( 3 )
Sub-Category
R.I. ABOVE 10 YEARS & FINE ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAURAV RAWAT
Adv. TAPAN SINGH,NIKHIL KUSHWAHA,NIKHIL KUSHWAHA, AVNEESH KUMAR,NIKHIL KUSHWAHA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ravindra Maithani , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha Sah
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
ADMISSION MATTERS -25
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-02-2025 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
| 26-05-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 05-05-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 28-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
| 06-04-2026 | ADMISSION MATTERS -25 |
Orders
Summary: CRLA 91/2025 - Gaurav Rawat v. State of Uttarakhand Outcome: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed appellant Gaurav Rawat's bail application and suspended execution of his sentence during appeal pendency. He was convicted under IPC Section 506 and POCSO Act Sections 5/6 for rape and criminal intimidation. The court found sufficient grounds for bail consideration, noting inconsistencies including a police medical referral predating the FIR lodging and a six-month delay in reporting. Rawat must execute a personal bond with two sureties. The appeal is listed for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: CRLA 91/2025 - Gaurav Rawat v. State of Uttarakhand Outcome: Bail granted. The High Court of Uttarakhand allowed appellant Gaurav Rawat's bail application and suspended execution of his sentence during appeal pendency. He was convicted under IPC Section 506 and POCSO Act Sections 5/6 for rape and criminal intimidation. The court found sufficient grounds for bail consideration, noting inconsistencies including a police medical referral predating the FIR lodging and a six-month delay in reporting. Rawat must execute a personal bond with two sureties. The appeal is listed for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts