SHYAM SINGH ALIAS KALA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1 /217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(M),89,351(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th April 2026.

CNR: UKHC010020992026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

BA1 /1015/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

BA1 /217/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPLICATIONS ( 5 )

Sub-Category

BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(M),89,351(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (Act No. 32 of 2012) Section 3(A),4(II),5(J)(II),5(1),6

Petitioner(s)

SHYAM SINGH ALIAS KALA

Adv. DEEPAK SHARMA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

16-02-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

06-04-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

01-04-2026

ORDER MATTERS -17

17-03-2026

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

06-04-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani

The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of Shyam Singh, accused of aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a minor girl child resulting in pregnancy. The court found sufficient grounds for detention based on the victim's consistent statement detailing repeated sexual assault, threats, and the accused's attempt to provide abortion pills after learning of the pregnancy, despite the applicant's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of Shyam Singh, accused of aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a minor girl child resulting in pregnancy. The court found sufficient grounds for detention based on the victim's consistent statement detailing repeated sexual assault, threats, and the accused's attempt to provide abortion pills after learning of the pregnancy, despite the applicant's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case