SHYAM SINGH ALIAS KALA vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA1/217/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(M),89,351(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010020992026
Filing Number
BA1/1015/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
BA1/217/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAM SINGH ALIAS KALA
Adv. DEEPAK SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of Shyam Singh, accused of aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a minor girl child resulting in pregnancy. The court found sufficient grounds for detention based on the victim's consistent statement detailing repeated sexual assault, threats, and the accused's attempt to provide abortion pills after learning of the pregnancy, despite the applicant's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
16-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA1/217/2026
The Uttarakhand High Court rejected the bail application of Shyam Singh, accused of aggravated penetrative sexual assault against a minor girl child resulting in pregnancy. The court found sufficient grounds for detention based on the victim's consistent statement detailing repeated sexual assault, threats, and the accused's attempt to provide abortion pills after learning of the pregnancy, despite the applicant's claims of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts