SHAFAT AKHTAR vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — C528 /195/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (act No. 45 of 1860) Section 323,376,504,506. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010020592026
Filing Number
C528 /998/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
C528 /195/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PROCEEDINGS OF POLICE CHALLANI CASES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAFAT AKHTAR
Adv. TAJHAR QAYYUM
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
NAHIDA
Adv. MEHBOOB RAHI,ABHISHEK TIWARI
Hearing History
Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 | |
| 25-02-2026 | FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3 |
Orders
The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application filed by Shafat Akhtar and quashed the entire criminal proceedings (Special Sessions Trial No.45 of 2025) against him under IPC Sections 323, 376, 504, and 506. The court accepted the settlement reached between the applicant and respondent no.2 with the involvement of community elders, as both parties confirmed they no longer wished to pursue the case and the complainant had no grievance against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Uttarakhand High Court allowed the compounding application filed by Shafat Akhtar and quashed the entire criminal proceedings (Special Sessions Trial No.45 of 2025) against him under IPC Sections 323, 376, 504, and 506. The court accepted the settlement reached between the applicant and respondent no.2 with the involvement of community elders, as both parties confirmed they no longer wished to pursue the case and the complainant had no grievance against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts