KALAMUDDIN vs VICE CHANCELLOR, G B PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, Advocate - SHUBHANG DOBHAL — WPSS/197/2024
Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: UKHC010020162024
Filing Number
WPSS/896/2024
Filing Date
19-Feb-2024
Registration No
WPSS/197/2024
Registration Date
19-Feb-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )
Sub-Category
RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 02-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALAMUDDIN
Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.VICE CHANCELLOR, G B PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, Advocate - SHUBHANG DOBHAL
-
2.DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION AND MONITORING
Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL
-
3.THE ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER
Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL
-
4.ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR LABOUR WELFARE OFFICER
Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar TiwariView PDF
The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the University's Competent Authority to re-examine the petitioner's regularisation claim under the amended Regularisation Rules of 2013 (as amended in December 2025), since the original 2017 rejection was based on the unamended rules. The Competent Authority must make a decision within four months from receiving a certified copy of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Sep-2024
Admission Matters -25
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
24-Jun-2024
Fresh Cases For Admission -3
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj Purohit
-
02-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pankaj PurohitView PDF
-
20-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WPSS/197/2024
The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the University's Competent Authority to re-examine the petitioner's regularisation claim under the amended Regularisation Rules of 2013 (as amended in December 2025), since the original 2017 rejection was based on the unamended rules. The Competent Authority must make a decision within four months from receiving a certified copy of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts