KALAMUDDIN vs VICE CHANCELLOR, G B PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, Advocate - SHUBHANG DOBHAL — WPSS /197/2024

Case under Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: UKHC010020162024

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPSS /896/2024

Filing Date

19-02-2024

Registration No

WPSS /197/2024

Registration Date

19-02-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE WRIT PETITION ( 1 )

Sub-Category

RELATING TO PAY AND ALLOWANCES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Under Article 226 of the Constituion of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

KALAMUDDIN

Adv. HARENDRA BELWAL

Respondent(s)

VICE CHANCELLOR, G B PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, Advocate - SHUBHANG DOBHAL

DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION AND MONITORING

Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL

THE ESTABLISHMENT OFFICER

Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL

ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR LABOUR WELFARE OFFICER

Adv. SHUBHANG DOBHAL

Hearing History

Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

20-02-2024

FRESH CASES AS DEFECTIVE -236

19-09-2024

ADMISSION MATTERS -25

24-06-2024

FRESH CASES FOR ADMISSION -3

Orders

23-03-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari

The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the University's Competent Authority to re-examine the petitioner's regularisation claim under the amended Regularisation Rules of 2013 (as amended in December 2025), since the original 2017 rejection was based on the unamended rules. The Competent Authority must make a decision within four months from receiving a certified copy of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the University's Competent Authority to re-examine the petitioner's regularisation claim under the amended Regularisation Rules of 2013 (as amended in December 2025), since the original 2017 rejection was based on the unamended rules. The Competent Authority must make a decision within four months from receiving a certified copy of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case