SHADAB vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A. — BA2/21/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. 45 of 1860) Section 302. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th April 2026.
CNR: UKHC010014972026
Filing Number
BA2/746/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Registration No
BA2/21/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
APPLICATIONS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
BAIL DURING INVESTIGATION ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
ALL SECTIONS (CIVIL AND CRIMINAL)
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHADAB
Adv. VAIBHAV SINGH CHAUHAN,NAINA MITTAL,NAINA MITTAL, ,NAINA MITTAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Advocate - G.A.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
28-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
27-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
Summary: In BA 2nd No. 21 of 2026, "Shadab v. State of Uttarakhand," Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani adjourned the matter for further hearing on 28.04.2026. No substantive order on merits was passed; the case was merely listed for the next date of hearing with both the applicant's counsel and the State's AGA present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Order Matters -17
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders On Applications -22
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish Naithani
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashish NaithaniView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Siddhartha SahView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA2/21/2026
Summary: In BA 2nd No. 21 of 2026, "Shadab v. State of Uttarakhand," Hon'ble Justice Ashish Naithani adjourned the matter for further hearing on 28.04.2026. No substantive order on merits was passed; the case was merely listed for the next date of hearing with both the applicant's counsel and the State's AGA present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts